View Single Post
  #56615  
Old 29-12-2019, 01:17 PM
qwerty2009 qwerty2009 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 235
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 2223 / Power: 15
qwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond reputeqwerty2009 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Great Bonks (STRICTLY for sponsored gal only)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmypang View Post
then consumers should not be blamed for speaking out. if sub standard service is acceptable. then what is wrong with consumers speaking out? both sides of the coin right? if we condone sub standard service, shouldnt OKT allow us lashing out at them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by babe90 View Post
Maybe should find out the reason first before keep pointing fingers at who to be blamed
Regardless of it, the previous ordeal should not be brought upon to the next customer if not it will be unfair to the next customer. The initial good customer does not mean that the next will be good too and vice-versa.
Sadly to say, working in this line will meet all sorts of people and OKT may only advise her on how to protect herself only. The OKTs do not really seen these girls before. If that is so, do I still need to pay the money since the previous customers had paid to the lady already? When a new transaction is being made, whatever happen in the past transactions should not bring forward to the new transaction, else it is really fair to the next customers. In fact, I heard a lot of worst stories from ladies working in Johor than in Sg (E.g. jbescortservice).

Customers paying the price would also have to bear the risk of uncertainty of girls service too. Similar to geylang, those OKTs would have no guaranteed of service against the working ladies too. End state, everyone goal is to earn money and it is up to the working ladies to decide and how honest the OKT are. A lady who is willing to please will definitely have more customers than those who are just taking shortcuts. An OKT who just blindly promised everything to customers will definitely lose its credibility going forward.

Ladies aside, I knew of few OKTs from different stable who is really bad :

1) OKT guaranteed CIM but when I reached the place and action in progress, lady say cannot CIM. Then I message OKT and OKT called her to CIM. This tells me that the stable is not honest and just want to get as much customers as possible and just guaranteed on everything without the ladies' consent at all. These stable is still present today.

2) Because the ladies need to pay tags (It is ok if you do not know what pay tag means), OKT will keep pushing customers to the new ladies who just came into their stable in order to complete their pay tag. When I tried to make a RTF booking to a previous-visited lady, the OKT told me she is not available and recommend a new lady to me. I told OKT "Nevermind, I book next time". The next moment, OKT told me the previous-visited lady is available. This is totally unfair to the ladies at all as after paying-tag, their real earnings started. The stable is still present today.

3) Once after the first action completed and having a rest, i chatted with a lady and the lady told me that she met some bad experience with customer and she complained to the OKT. The next reply the OKT gave to the lady is "Is the money safe?". Such OKT just care about money first before the lady. The stable is still present today.

Conclusion is that no one is right or wrong. Whether you go to geylang or book through this website, there is bound to have uncertainty of service involved. Nevertheless, thanks all those who shared their frs to bring transparency and it is up to each individual to perceive the risk ahead. Risk-averse like me are much more careful in the selection of ladies...