[botakboy]

Originally Posted by boingster

HIV blood tests are pretty specific for the virus itself. Alot of the clinics offer quick result testing which look for the HIV specific protein. However, these quick tests may not be too accurate if you get the test done too early. For example, if you had unprotected sex, or had acquired HIV infection by other means today and went for the blood test tomorrow, the test will be negative. It takes time for the virus to essentially multiply and have a 'presence' in your blood. That is why the advice is normally at least 6-8weeks after the encounter is recommended. Depending on the protocol, sometimes when these rapid tests are positive, your blood samples will be sent to the labs for another test which have higher accuracy (sensitivity) to diagnosing HIV. That is called the Western Blot.

This is the reason why these HIV tests can mislead individuals. Thus a good history taking at the clinic should be carried out by medical personnel.

And to reply about the job applications. Your HIV status is private and confidential and will not be made known to companies that request it. If another party or a company is seeking knowledge on your HIV status, they will not be able to get such information unless you personally give them the permission. The only one that will know your HIV status is the government, this is not because they put a mark against you, but it is an international law to declare your HIV status. GP's who perform blood tests for you are required to provide the ministry of health your details - this is for medical scientists or infectious diseases specialists, or whoever who are involved in the registry to observe the HIV population numbers and be able to launch campaigns or promote safe sex etc.. etc..

so in your opinion do i need to do it? since its more than 3 years + since i had my last casual encounter yup.