|
|
|||||||
| Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature Visit Sam's Alfresco Heaven. Singapore's best Alfresco Coffee Experience! If you're up to your ears with all this Sex Talk and would like to take a break from it all to discuss other interesting aspects of life in Singapore, pop over and join in the fun. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
10-09-2014, 05:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Sammyboy famous in the news again, but will the DBS adviser get back his old job?
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.straitstimes.com/news/sin...e-vice-ring-ca By Elena Chong SINGAPORE - All of about 40 men who have gone before the courts for having paid sex with a minor, in a high-profile online vice ring case first reported in 2012, have been found guilty so far. But on Tuesday, Mr Timothy Gan Wee Jin, 40, bucked the trend when he became the first to be cleared by a district court. Mr Gan, then an investment adviser with DBS, was accused of paying $650 for the sexual services of a female under 18 years old at Strand Hotel, Bencoolen Street, between 6.32pm and 8.42pm on Dec 8, 2010. Mr Gan, who is currently unemployed, had maintained throughout the eight-day trial that he did not have sex with the 17-year-old. He had booked her through her pimp, Tang Boon Thiew, who responded to Mr Gan's private message via the Sammyboy forum on Dec 7 to confirm his engagement. The prosecution's case was that the minor recalled six occasions in which she did not have sex with clients, and given that Mr Gan was not one of them, he must had had sex with her. But the defence, led by Mr Thong Chee Kun, submitted that all evidence showed that the minor was unsure about the six occasions. There was also no corroborative evidence on the six occasions. The minor also could not remember the exact number of times where no sex took place. She had testified during the trial that she could not recognise Mr Gan, one of 51 men charged with having sex with the teen. District Judge May Mesenas said there was no direct evidence that the minor had sexual intercourse with Mr Gan, whose defence was one of denial. She said it was not clear the number of occasions the minor did not have sex. She found that the minor had given two different versions on the number of occasions that she did not have sex with her clients, which leads one to question the reliability of the evidence. Judge Mesenas said she did not think it was safe to convict Mr Gan based on the minor's evidence. She acquitted Mr Gan, saying the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The maximum penalty for the commercial sex offence is seven years' jail and a fine. Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com. 
|
| Advert Space Available |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
